TORONTO, ON — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre unveiled a bold plan on Friday to tighten Canada’s ethics laws, aiming to close what he dubs the “Carney loophole” as he ramps up criticism of Liberal leadership contender Mark Carney. Speaking at a press conference in Toronto, Poilievre proposed amendments to the Conflict of Interest Act that would mandate financial transparency for party leadership candidates, mirroring the stringent disclosure rules currently imposed on cabinet ministers and the prime minister.
Under Poilievre’s plan, leadership hopefuls would need to submit detailed financial disclosures to the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner within 30 days of declaring candidacy, with public access granted within 60 days. The proposal also extends to future prime ministers and cabinet ministers, requiring them to divest assets that could pose conflicts of interest—either through an arm’s-length sale or a blind trust—to prevent self-serving governance. “Politicians should never use their office for personal gain,” Poilievre emphasized, framing the changes as a safeguard for Canadian taxpayers.
The Conservative push comes amid escalating political friction, with Poilievre accusing Carney of dodging transparency by not voluntarily revealing his financial holdings. “There’s no legal barrier stopping Mr. Carney from doing the right thing today and disclosing everything to Canadians,” Poilievre said, suggesting Carney’s reluctance masks interests that could undermine Canada’s position, especially as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens tariffs amid Carney’s financial interests in American companies. The Tories warn that if Carney wins leadership and swiftly calls an election—as he’s hinted he might—his mandatory disclosures under the current Conflict of Interest Act wouldn’t surface until after Canadians vote, given the act’s 120-day public disclosure timeline for cabinet appointees.
Poilievre didn’t mince words, branding Carney “sneaky” and alleging his undisclosed financial ties “run against our national interest,” potentially weakening Canada in trade negotiations with the U.S. The Carney campaign has yet to respond to queries about exceeding existing ethics requirements, leaving the accusation unanswered as of Friday evening.
The press conference opened with Poilievre addressing Trump’s tariff threats head-on. “My message to the president is this: Knock it off. Stop the chaos,” he declared, advocating for increased trade to benefit American workers with “bigger paycheques and lower prices.” He quickly pivoted to domestic critiques, slamming the Liberal government for inaction since the tariff saga began. “They’ve passed no new laws, removed no tax increases, and haven’t approved a single new LNG plant, mine, or pipeline,” he charged, accusing them of failing to bolster Canada’s economic sovereignty.
Poilievre also took aim at broader Liberal shortcomings, asserting they’ve neglected pressing issues like the housing crisis, inflation, violent crime, and excessive spending. “We need to take back control of our economy and bring home our jobs,” he said, positioning his party as the antidote to Liberal inertia. The proposed ethics overhaul, he argued, is a step toward ensuring leaders prioritize Canadians over personal profit, especially in turbulent times.
Carney, if appointed prime minister, would face the existing Conflict of Interest Act, which applies to cabinet ministers, parliamentary secretaries, and the PM but not MPs broadly—those fall under the less rigorous Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons. The act mandates divesting controlled assets like stocks or bonds that government decisions could influence, a rule Poilievre wants extended preemptively to leadership contenders.
As Canada braces for a possible snap election and grapples with U.S. trade pressures, Poilievre’s proposal injects a new layer of contention into an already heated political landscape, spotlighting transparency as a battleground ahead of the Liberal leadership decision expected Sunday, March 9.
xAI’s Inferences and Considerations
Poilievre’s focus on the “Carney loophole” suggests a strategic escalation in his campaign to promote accountability after 9 years of Liberal ethics violations. By tying ethics reforms to Carney’s financial opacity, Poilievre may be preempting a narrative that Carney’s global finance background—highlighted by his roles at Goldman Sachs and Brookfield Asset Management—could indeed be a liability rather than an asset in a nationalist-leaning election climate. This move aligns with Poilievre’s broader “Canada First” initiative evident in his recent London rally, where he pointed out Carney as an elitist out of touch with ordinary Canadians.
The timing of this proposal, amid Trump’s tariff threats, is also significant in the light of considerable risk to the Canadian economy, particularly with the threat of an unseasoned and ill-prepared Carney taking the Liberal helm. Polls cited by Reuters show Liberals slightly narrowing the gap with Conservatives, partly due to a perception that Carney may be able to handle Trump—a perception Poilievre might be countering by casting doubt on Carney’s impartiality. However, the lack of immediate response from Carney’s camp leaves room for speculation: Is he withholding disclosure to avoid pre-election scrutiny, or is he indeed misleading the Canadian voting public by exploiting an ethics loophole?
Keywords: Pierre Poilievre Mark Carney conflict of interest, Canada ethics law changes 2025, Conservative Party financial disclosure proposal, Mark Carney Liberal leadership ethics, Poilievre Carney trade war Canada, Conflict of Interest Act Canada amendment, Canadian election 2025 transparency issues, Liberal Party of Canada habitual corruption.
